econ.studio
Elastic vs Inelastic Demand
Section 4 of 4
Section 4

Worked Example and Exam Traps

Take a single price change — a +25%+25\% rise — and apply it to two goods: gasoline and restaurant burgers. The price move is identical. The revenue outcome is opposite. That contrast is not a coincidence; it is the entire concept of elasticity made visible.

Case 1: Gasoline (inelastic)

Both goods start at P = \4and and Q = 100units,givingthesamebaselinetotalrevenueof units, giving the same baseline total revenue of $400.Forgasoline,thepricerisesfrom. For gasoline, the price rises from $4to to $5$.

%ΔP=544×100=+25%\%\,\Delta P = \frac{5 - 4}{4} \times 100 = +25\%

Because drivers have few short-run alternatives, quantity demanded falls only slightly — from 100 gallons to 95 gallons.

%ΔQd=95100100×100=5%\%\,\Delta Q_d = \frac{95 - 100}{100} \times 100 = -5\%

The PED magnitude is the ratio of the two percentage changes. A 5% quantity drop in response to a 25% price rise gives a ratio well below 1 — the definition of inelastic demand.

PED=5%25%=0.2<1(inelastic)|PED| = \frac{5\%}{25\%} = 0.2 < 1 \quad \text{(inelastic)}

Total revenue moves with the price rise: 100 \times \4 = $400before, before, 95 \times $5 = $475$ after. Revenue went up when price rose. That upward movement in revenue is the inelastic signature.

TR:100×$4=$400    95×$5=$475(revenue up)TR: \quad 100 \times \$4 = \$400 \;\longrightarrow\; 95 \times \$5 = \$475 \quad (\text{revenue up})

Case 2: Restaurant burgers (elastic)

Now apply the same +25%+25\% price change to restaurant burgers, starting from the same P = \4,, Q = 100$ baseline.

%ΔP=544×100=+25%\%\,\Delta P = \frac{5 - 4}{4} \times 100 = +25\%

Burgers have many substitutes — other restaurants, home cooking, different fast-food options. A 25% price rise drives quantity demanded down sharply, from 100 burgers to 60 burgers.

%ΔQd=60100100×100=40%\%\,\Delta Q_d = \frac{60 - 100}{100} \times 100 = -40\%

The PED magnitude is now greater than 1: the quantity response is proportionally larger than the price change, which is what elastic means.

PED=40%25%=1.6>1(elastic)|PED| = \frac{40\%}{25\%} = 1.6 > 1 \quad \text{(elastic)}

Total revenue falls: 100 \times \4 = $400before, before, 60 \times $5 = $300$ after. Revenue went down when price rose. That is the elastic signature — the quantity loss more than offsets the higher price per unit.

TR:100×$4=$400    60×$5=$300(revenue down)TR: \quad 100 \times \$4 = \$400 \;\longrightarrow\; 60 \times \$5 = \$300 \quad (\text{revenue down})

Side-by-side summary

Gasoline (inelastic)Burgers (elastic)
Price change\4 \to $5$ (+25%)\4 \to $5$ (+25%)
Quantity change10095100 \to 95 gallons (5%-5\%)10060100 \to 60 burgers (40%-40\%)
PED|PED|0.20.21.61.6
VerdictInelastic (PED<1|PED| < 1)Elastic (PED>1|PED| > 1)
Total revenue before\400$\400$
Total revenue after\475$\300$
Revenue directionUp (price rise + inelastic = more revenue)Down (price rise + elastic = less revenue)

These calculations use the simple percentage method — dividing the change by the original value. Exam boards (particularly AP and IB) sometimes require the midpoint method, which divides by the average of the two values instead; the elastic/inelastic labels come out the same for these numbers. See the price elasticity of demand glossary page for the midpoint formula.

To see the total-revenue effect in motion, open the supply and demand model and drag the demand curve — watch how the revenue rectangle changes shape as the curve steepens or flattens. For the complete definition, derivation, and determinants of elasticity, visit the price elasticity of demand glossary page.