econ.studio
Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans Model
Section 6 of 16
Section 6 - Household

The Household Problem

The representative dynastic household chooses a consumption path {c(t)}t0\{c(t)\}_{t\geq 0} to maximise its discounted lifetime utility. Three components must be specified: the objective, the asset accumulation equation, and the boundary conditions.

Objective

U0=0eρtu(c(t))L(t)dtU_0 = \int_0^\infty e^{-\rho t}\, u(c(t))\, L(t)\, dt
objective
Family-wide utility. Each living member at time tt has utility u(c(t))u(c(t)); the family discounts at rate ρ\rho.

Normalising L0=1L_0 = 1 and using L(t)=entL(t) = e^{n t}, this can be written in per-member form:

U0=0e(ρn)tu(c(t))dt.U_0 = \int_0^\infty e^{-(\rho - n)\, t}\, u(c(t))\, dt.
The *effective discount rate* is ρn\rho - n, not ρ\rho.
u(c)={c1θ11θθ1logcθ=1u(c) = \begin{cases} \dfrac{c^{1-\theta} - 1}{1 - \theta} & \theta \neq 1 \\[4pt] \log c & \theta = 1 \end{cases}
Per-period CRRA utility.

The budget constraint

Let a(t)a(t) denote per-worker asset holdings. The household earns wage w(t)w(t) on its unit of labour and interest r(t)r(t) on its assets, consumes c(t)c(t), and accumulates the remainder. Aggregate assets evolve as A˙=rA+wLcL\dot A = r A + w L - c L. Dividing by LL and using a˙=A˙/Lna\dot a = \dot A / L - n\, a:

  1. Step 1
    A(t)=a(t)L(t),A˙=a˙L+aL˙=(a˙+na)LA(t) = a(t)\, L(t),\quad \dot A = \dot a L + a \dot L = (\dot a + n a) L

    From the definition of aa and Leibniz.

  2. Step 2
    A˙=rA+wLcL    (a˙+na)L=(ra+wc)L\dot A = r A + w L - c L \;\Longleftrightarrow\; (\dot a + n a) L = (r a + w - c) L

    Substitute the aggregate accumulation equation.

  3. Step 3
      a˙(t)=(r(t)n)a(t)+w(t)c(t)  \boxed{\;\dot a(t) = \bigl(r(t) - n\bigr) a(t) + w(t) - c(t)\;}

    The per-worker budget constraint. Per-capita dilution shows up as na-n a.

The no-Ponzi-game condition

Without a restriction on debt, the household could roll over interest payments forever and consume infinitely. The **no-Ponzi condition** forbids this:

limta(t)exp ⁣(0t[r(s)n],ds)0.\lim_{t \to \infty} a(t)\, \exp\!\left(-\int_0^t [r(s) - n]\\, ds\right) \geq 0.
no-ponzi
Discounted asset holdings cannot diverge to -\infty - the present value of any debt must be (weakly) zero in the limit.

The full statement

max{c(t)}  0e(ρn)tu(c(t))dts.t.a˙=(rn)a+wc,  a(0)=a0,  limta(t)e0t(rn)ds0.\max_{\{c(t)\}}\; \int_0^\infty e^{-(\rho - n) t}\, u(c(t))\, dt\quad \text{s.t.}\quad \dot a = (r - n) a + w - c,\; a(0) = a_0,\; \lim_{t\to\infty} a(t) e^{-\int_0^t(r-n)ds} \geq 0.
household-problem-full